Monday, May 14, 2012

Moodle design and facilitation

The next task in our project was to design and develop Moodle activities to form the online component of a blended learning SES Induction program.  Each team member was assigned a topic from the induction program and asked to create engaging online activities to support the learning of new SES members.

To achieve this aim we spent two weekends together at SES HQ in Wollongong.  During the first weekend we focused on the practical skills required to create content and activities in Moodle.  The group completed the development of their topics over the next fortnight, after which we met again for a second weekend to critique the program as a whole, and learn about online facilitation.  We also formed groups and designed an evaluation strategy.

Now the group are busy refining their online activities in response to the critique and preparing to trial the online component of the induction in their region.  (Videos of the critique coming soon).  The evaluation of the induction program will be undertaken from three perspectives:
  1. evaluate the effectiveness of the training in meeting workforce needs
  2. determining the success of the trial
  3. evaluate the outcomes of the blended learning experience vs a face to face learning experience.
It will make interesting reading I'm sure!

We did 2 other activities during our face to face meetings - one was a validation which I'll write about in a separate post - and the other was discussion about where the skills and knowledge gained in this project might lead for each individual in our team.  The responses were positive and wide ranging.  The team have agreed to share their ideas as comments on this blog.


 Left to right, back row:  Patty Maxwell (Queanbeyan), Marina Chadiloff (co-facilitator), Warne Boulton (Ocean Shores), Jean-Mary Botfield (Moree), Sonya Oyston (Wollongong), Ann Brady (facilitator), Todd Burns (Wollongong), Robyn Barco (Aberdare).  Middle row:  Gaille Barr (Sydney), Deon Dowdy (Binjura), Trish Malone (Canberra), Mark Healey (Raymond Terrace).  Front row:  Danielle Devine (Jindabyne).  Missing:  Su Bowing (Kiama Community College - RTO representative)

Friday, April 27, 2012

Webinars – what would I do differently next time?

Reflections from the group:

“In future sessions, I believe that I would utilise more slides with graphics to embrace learners with a preference for visual stimulation as this was lacking. I need to allow more preparation time to ensure I have all my resources prepared in plenty of time.”

“The other area I would change were the activities, although they were planned in my session, they may be better placed at more frequent intervals throughout the session. The seven minute rule for concentration appears to be less with the online environment, with the need to keep the learners more engaged through activities.”

“The lack of time was my biggest challenge and my delivery was hurried towards the end because I had run out time.   Should I be running this session again I would spend more time on ensuring the session runs to time and it may be necessary to cut some of the information out or extend the proposed session length.   Limiting the discussion between participants would also assist in running to time and this is something I would do differently next time.  The facilitator needs to be strong and ensure the participants are kept on task.”
“Preparing and presenting to another person, who has subject knowledge, was invaluable. The finished presentation flowed much better than the first draft(s). In hindsight I can see how a training package would go thru an evolution of about 5 iterations before it could be classed as ‘finished’.
What could have gone well? The animation of the slide presentation would have ‘made the presentation’. Instead it failed because I did not research the limitations of the webinar software. I have learned a valuable lesson here!!”

“I found that havening visual aids prepared worked well and enhanced the flow of the presentation. I think I would have come across disorganised if I had not been able to keep most of the participants engage and having “props” helps me be less nervous.
I found I learnt more about how to engage learners from watching the presentations of the other participants as I could concentrate on what work and did not work for them.”

 
“What I would do differently is practice the timing of the session beforehand, which I did not think to do this time, I put the clock on but did not know how to set the time. I would ensure I knew everyone’s name as one of the log on names only has an initial and when I went to call on them I did not know their first name. I would ask participants to put their names against their comments so I could call on them by name rather than “who wrote xxx””

“Once one the participants started writing responses on the whiteboard others joined in. Discussion around some of the selected responses was good with a number of people joining in the conversation and expanding thus giving further insight to the topic. This also gives a sense of ownership and acceptance to the individuals.

I think that next time I could possibly have columns on the whiteboard and group similar responses in column with relevant headings. Prepare a slide/s for participants as a visual cue with key points for discussion and have the question written for them to see during the brainstorming. “


“Next time?- If using video, send it out for learners to watch prior to webinar-Have a plan ‘B’ prepared when using technology that is prone to problems-Practice more with the functions of the webinar program, including websurf.”


“The research formed the basis of my session, and the fact that I was researching learning theory and design models impacting on how I presented. Originally I thought of presenting the information, then getting them to do an activity until I read more and decided the best way maybe to promote interactive learning where I am the facilitator and the learners engage in their own learning.”


“The activities worked well and getting the participants to do interact was great…… the delegating of the roles works well eg Patty opened, then Mark etc.”


“What I would change next time?  Not to be so ambitious with the lesson plan, until I’m more comfortable with the software which I’m to use.  With regards the feedback I would communicate directly with colleagues be that by e-mail or phone because survey or asking others to give feedback time consuming and unreliable.”






Tuesday, April 17, 2012

So far so good...

It's been a helter-skelter time with everyone working hard and somehow managing to fit in the extra workload required to successfully complete this program.

So far we have completed the first part of the program. Participants were asked to consult with their learners (each other), then design and deliver a short webinar, and finally reflect upon their experiences. The learning was delivered using a combination of Moodle activities and live webinars. The reflections are coming through nicely and make interesting reading. When they are all submitted I will summarise and post to the blog.

Alongside the webinars participants have been working on their professional practice tasks. Part 1 involved identifying challenges which have been faced in their current training and assessment practice. Part 2, the current task, asks each participant to reflect on and analyse the information gathered and identify areas for improvement.

This project has reminded me of the importance of our choice of language when designing learning. The first task to be undertaken in the project was to write the L&A strategy and the assessment tasks for a variation to scope - so I was writing for the auditor. When I began to develop the Moodle activities for our learners I transferred some of what I had written in these documents to the site. The consequences were predictable - nobody knew what to do! Whoops!
3 webinars and several phone calls later we got there!

In spite of these issues the webinars delivered by participants were well constructed, and between the group, they made good use of all the interactive whiteboard tools. They were the longest and noisiest webinars I have ever been involved in. There is a fantastic positive energy about this group who engage well with each and are simply ready to have a go.

Our next phase is to design and develop a blended learning induction program for the SES. Each member of the group has been allocated one section of the program. Currently the group are identifying learners who will pilot the induction program which we intend to do during the week beginning the 20th May. They are also exploring resources they might use for their section and evaluating an existing induction program from the Royal Fire Service.

I'm looking forward to meeting everyone at the end of April for our e-learning design and Moodle training weekend. Will let you know what happens next!

Monday, March 19, 2012

... and we're off!


We have 15 participants plus our project manager - wow - was only expecting 10. It's great that there is such a high level of enthusiam about e-learning which can be a daunting proposition. Our learners are volunteers and staff from the SES and staff from the RTO, Kiama Community College. There is a good mix of experience in the group including SES trainers and assessors and e-learning/instructional designers. Hopefully this will lead to a collaborative and engaging learning experience for all.

Yesterday was day 1 and I just had a quick look around the site. So far about half of our participants are in and most have had a good look round. A couple have started the initial socialisation activities which is great to see.

The first of our 4 live webinars is next Tuesday 27th March when we start to focus on the design and delivery of webinars.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Getting started


e-Skilling the SES is a blended learning program designed and developed in partnership between the NSW State Emergency Service and Kiama Community College. Our aim is to train 10 professional educators to design and develop e-learning in both synchronous and asynchronous environments. Together we will produce a blended learning induction program for the SES as part of the learning process.

The program is funded by the Higher Education Pathways Project, a part of the National VET E-learning Strategy.


The first part of any project is always challenging in my experience!


John
Young, the Project Manager, and NSW State Emergency Service Learning and Development Consultant, is busy recruiting participants and formalising the partnership with Kiama Community College.

Tara Me
ehan, Kiama Community College VET Manager, is working on the variation to scope.

Ann Brady and Marina Chadiloff have started work on the design of our program - 5 units of competency from the Diploma in Training Design and Development (TAE50211).



TAEDEL503A Develop e-learning resources
TAEDEL501A Facilitate e-learning
TAEASS503A Lead assessment validation processes
TAEPDD501A Maintain and enhance professional practice
TAEDES505A Evaluate a training program.

We are teaching people to design e-learning resources for use in a blended learning program - so our program is delivered using a combination of asynchronous online learning, live webinars, face to face training and work-based tasks.

Our tools of choice are:
  • Moodle learning management system
    - for asynchronous communication and learning and assessment activities, and
    - a place for learners to develop e-learning activities which, collectively, will become the online component of the SES Induction program.

    Learners will also be encouraged to use audio, video, ARED, Jing and other appropriate software to develop their e-learning activities.

  • Blackboard Collaborate for the live webinars. Participants will be asked to design and develop a short learning experience in Blackboard Collaborate.
Alongside this we will be asking people to consider their ongoing professional development and towards the end of the program we will validate our assessment tasks and processes.

So far, we have developed a course outline for the 5 units, the assessment tools and the first phase of the online activities are ready to go. A workbook for the face to face training is in progress as are the remaining online activities...

Our start date is 19th March - so right now it's all stations go!!